Moderators: The Administrators, Moderators
Reesane wrote:What I don't understand is why some people beleve that their moral and ethical belefs enable them to prevent somone from removing a (tecknicly) parisitic organism from their body because it could become a human being.
Silver Bells wrote:It's almost like murder
Reesane wrote:What I don't understand is why some people beleve that their moral and ethical belefs enable them to prevent somone from removing a (tecknicly) parisitic organism from their body because it could become a human being.
Tom Bone wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but should this be in BKO
Gauntlet wrote:Tom Bone wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but should this be in BKO
I thought about that, but this is general discussion. I don't see anything wrong with it if people are respectful and considerate when voicing their opinion. If it gets out of hand, then a lock or move at the very least may be in order.
PotterFreak wrote:Reesane wrote:What I don't understand is why some people beleve that their moral and ethical belefs enable them to prevent somone from removing a (tecknicly) parisitic organism from their body because it could become a human being.
I feel I must dissagree with you there. they aren't 'parasitic', they're babies. How do you consider a child a 'parasitic oganism'? And just becuase it hasn't been fully developed yet, doesn't mean it's not a human being, not to mention a LIVING CREATURE.
And I feel about the same as Guantlet on this. I dissagree with it, and I think there are other ways, but in the end, it's the parents choice.Silver Bells wrote:It's almost like murder
Actually I consider it murder. When you have an abortion, you are killing a child. It's the same thing as srangling, or poisoning a baby. When you are given a baby, it's your responsibility to make sure that baby is taken care of. Not kill it because you can't care for it at the moment.
Mewberries151 wrote:Okay, guys...just as a formality, since this is a highly controversial and touchy subject, I'm going to ask in advance that you keep this professional and clean.
You're free to debate, but out and out arguing, put downs, and/or insults directed towards a person or their beliefs will get this topic (and any similar threads after it) locked.
Just so you know guys, okay? Keep it cool.
Lani wrote:Eh, in the end, people (real or cartoon) are naked and having a good time. What's wrong with that?
PotterFreak wrote:Why does everyone think it's the mothers responsibility? I think the father should have some say in it.
I understand that the mother will have the most responsibility, just because she's the mother, but if the father has any sense at all he would take some part in his kids life.
PotterFreak wrote:Why does everyone think it's the mothers responsibility? I think the father should have some say in it.
I understand that the mother will have the most responsibility, just because she's the mother, but if the father has any sense at all he would take some part in his kids life.
WHY, DEE VEE OF COURSE! wrote:As far as the issue of abortion goes, I'm pretty much pro-choice. It's up the the mother to decide whether it would be best to go through with it; one has to think about things like her being able to take care of the child, whether it was conceived by a rape, etc. I do think that every person has a right to life, but an embryo is an embryo.
Suppose if the child had been born, and led a miserable life because there was no one to take care of it?
WHAT A LOSER wrote:PotterFreak wrote:Why does everyone think it's the mothers responsibility? I think the father should have some say in it.
I understand that the mother will have the most responsibility, just because she's the mother, but if the father has any sense at all he would take some part in his kids life.
True. I agree. I think a lot of the responsibilty belongs to the father, since he was involved in the whole... conception process. And because it's the right thing to do.
WHY, DEE VEE OF COURSE! wrote:I was talking like, after-birth. xD; Excuse me if I got the meaning wrong.
<s>My getting married would not involve this at all so...</s>
I don't think a child really has rights unless it's fully developed. If it's still in an early stage or embryo or something, it's not technically a full human being. I don't mean to sound apathetic, but it's fact. I think if it's almost around spitting out time, to have an abortion then (unless the life of the mother was in danger or it was absoultely impossible to take care of) would be murder. But otherwise, it's not.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests